Our core mission
Data-driven insights that improve research integrity and the quality of scientific publications. We measure provenance, not attention.
Ripeta’s methodologies and tools examine the content of published papers and look for the hallmarks of responsible science – features that Ripeta calls Trust Markers. The aim is to improve the integrity and reproducibility of scientific research.
Ripeta’s Trust Markers are comprehensive in coverage, giving unparalleled insights into transparency and reproducibility.
Utilizing Natural Language Processing, our machine learning models extract key information from the full text of papers, allowing fully-customised reports and dashboards to be created.
Introducing Dimensions Research Integrity, powered by Ripeta
Among the consulting services provided by Ripeta is the Dimensions Research Integrity Report, a report for a specific set of documents defined by the client. The report outlines global, regional, and institutional trust marker trends. It includes analysis done using the Ripeta methodology to answer specific questions outlined by the client requirements. Find out more
Dimensions Research Integrity: The world’s most comprehensive research integrity dataset
- Comprehensive journal coverage covering the last 10 years across all publishers
- Assess your organization’s responsible research reporting over time and benchmark against peers
- Gain knowledge and insights to help make quality improvements across your organization
- Ensure compliance with open science policies and reporting requirements
Built on the world’s largest research integrity dataset of over 33 million research publications stretching back 10 years, Ripeta offers publishers, funders, and institutions unparalleled insights into the quality of scientific communication.
Publishers
Scale integrity checks on authors and data compliance to preserve reputation and reduce retractions.
Compare practices against policies and similar publishers.
Government & Funders
Understand how policy translates to practice. Measure fiscal efficacy.
Monitor the implementation and uptake of good science indicators.
Institutions
Improve research reporting quality, increase funding opportunities, and protect reputation.
Identify local practices needing attention and intervene before publication, if needed.
What our customers say about us
